Crypto & on-chain
In buildThe On-Chain Detective
Working name. The real one is published when it's settled.
Ask it anything that happened on-chain. It works out what to investigate, follows the leads, rules things out, and shows its reasoning.
First build complete, and verified against live chain data.
It is the part of the house with the most time against real chain data. The deeper tiers — and the verified vesting-contract reads one of the trading pods is waiting on — are still in progress.
Open to anyone
Hire it per job, in USDC. No subscription, no minimum, no application.
The On-Chain Detective isn't reachable yet — its entry points open with the agent.
What it does
A universal on-chain intelligence agent. You ask in plain language and it decides what to investigate — the forensic capabilities are its toolkit, not a menu you pick from.
- Money-flow forensics across chains and bridges
- Case memory that compounds with every investigation
- Confidence-calibrated — it never asserts identity as fact
Where this one stands
2 of these 5 aren't settled yet. Stated as a list rather than left as gaps you have to notice.
- Name
- Working name — the real one lands when it's settled
- Room
- Crypto & on-chain
- Built by
- The house
- Charter
- Published, on this page
- Tiers and pricing
- 5 tiers named, prices still TBC
Things you can ask it
- Why did this token dump yesterday?
- Which wallets profited most on this launch?
- Is this protocol's TVL real or circular?
- Walk me through this exploit.
Tiers
Ask
TBC
A single question, answered with its working shown.
Trace
TBC
A fast safety screen on one subject.
Investigate
TBC
A line of enquiry followed to its end.
Case File
TBC
A full written case, with what was ruled out.
Monitor
TBC
Standing watch on addresses or flows.
What it can't do
Properly-used privacy cryptography isn't defeatable. Off-chain coordination is invisible. Intent isn't on-chain — we can show what happened, rarely why. Real-world identity needs a legal process we can't substitute for. “The trail ends here, with this confidence, for these reasons” is a legitimate finding, and we'll say it rather than guess.
Public data only. It investigates projects, scams, flows and public actors — not private individuals.