Skip to content
Clicking
← The Vetting Agent

Sample output · Lite Check

One real run, copied out unedited.

Not an illustration of what a report might look like. This is a Lite Check that The Vetting Agent produced against live data, reproduced exactly as it arrived — including everything it declared about the limits of its own work.

Ran
Subject
Aave (PoS) (AAVE) · polygon
Momentum
58/100
Liquidity health
75/100
Assessed for
Entry

Read the flags first

This run raised three, and none of them are about the token being bad. They are the agent being specific about what it could not establish — which is the difference between a finding and a gap.

  • ticker ambiguity
  • prior deployments unchecked
  • custody not verified

The first one is worth dwelling on. Asked about “AAVE”, the agent resolved the ticker with low confidence, landed on a Polygon-wrapped token rather than the canonical one, and said so — in the flag, and again in its coverage record. It would have been easy to quietly assess the wrong asset and read as though it were the right one.

Why a declared gap is not a finding →

The card the agent renders

The Lite Check for Aave (PoS) (AAVE) · polygon as a shareable card: scores, flags, the written read, market data and the coverage record.

The agent generates this itself, in the same run. It is not styled to match this site on purpose — it travels on its own, into a thread or a chat, where our design isn't there to frame it.

The deliverable, in full

CLICKING · LITE CHECK
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Aave (PoS) (AAVE)  ·  polygon
Wed, 09 Sep 2026 18:40:13 GMT

  MOMENTUM           58/100  ████████████░░░░░░░░
  LIQUIDITY HEALTH   75/100  ███████████████░░░░░

ASSESSED FOR
  Entry — Should I buy this, at this price, today?  (house default)

FLAGS
  ⚠ ticker ambiguity
  ⚠ prior deployments unchecked
  ⚠ custody not verified

THE READ
  This is a Polygon-wrapped AAVE token with $1.24M liquidity against a $7.82M
  FDV—liquidity covers only 15.9% of valuation, which is thin and material. A
  sell-side test on Uniswap V2 executed without blocking, but conditional
  blocks (size-based, holder-based, or venue-specific) were not ruled out.
  Volume is rising and running 1.5× the 24h pace at $212.7k, though order flow
  favors sellers 984 to 826 buys. The most important detail: liquidity depth
  relative to valuation leaves little room for slippage on meaningful position
  sizes, and prior deployments by this operator remain unchecked.

MARKET DATA
  FDV             $7.82M
  Liquidity       $1.24M  (15.87% of FDV)
  24h volume      $212.7K
  24h txns        1,810
  Holders         269,030
  Volume trend    rising

WHAT TO WATCH
  • Monitor whether 24h volume sustains above $212.7k or begins to
    contract—rising pace is the only positive signal present
  • Test a moderately sized sell order on Uniswap V2 to confirm no
    size-conditional block exists beyond the one-hour delay already verified
  • Cross-reference the deployer (0x63ec5767f54f6943750a70eb6117ea2d9ca77313)
    history on Etherscan to determine whether prior token deployments exist
    and how they resolved

DATA COVERAGE
  · Market data: DexScreener, 7 pair(s) on polygon.
  · Token resolved by ticker-search (confidence: low).
  · Sell-path simulation: executed against polygon block 93516092 via Uniswap
    V2 (Polygon) — outcome sellable.
  · Privileged powers: inventoried at block 93516092 — 0 confirmed exercisable
    by owner.
  · Operator history: deployer 0x63ec5767f54f6943750a70eb6117ea2d9ca77313 read
    at block 93516092; prior deployments NOT checked (no indexer).
  · Contract screening: GoPlus, assessed.
  · Holder count: 269,030 addresses (GoPlus) — a count of addresses, not of
    parties.
  · Privileged-key custody: NOT verified — Neither an owner nor a proxy admin
    was resolved, so what guards this contract could not be established.
  · Float composition: top 10 holders at block 93516092 hold 50.22% of supply;
    45.00% of supply sits in contracts, custodial wallets or burn addresses
    rather than individual holders.

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Informational assessment only — not financial advice. Generated by an
autonomous agent from public data at the timestamp shown; market conditions
change and data sources can be incomplete or wrong. Verify independently
before risking capital.

Figures are a snapshot of the moment it ran. Re-running today would return different market data and could reach different conclusions — this build reads sources that report current state rather than a fixed block, and the report says so itself under provenance.

Every tier this agent offers, and what each one is for, is on its page.

The Vetting Agent →